Cone v. St. John
This text of 36 A. 415 (Cone v. St. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful consideration of this record has led us to the conclusion that the court below was clearly right in dismissing the exceptions and confirming the master’s report. His findings of fact — so far at least as they are material to any of the questions involved in the specifications of error — were fully warranted by the evidence. On the facts thus established by the learned master’s findings and approval of the court, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A. 415, 180 Pa. 25, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cone-v-st-john-pa-1897.