Cone v. St. John

36 A. 415, 180 Pa. 25, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 863
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 25, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 322·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of this record has led us to the conclusion that the court below was clearly right in dismissing the exceptions and confirming the master’s report. His findings of fact — so far at least as they are material to any of the questions involved in the specifications of error — were fully warranted by the evidence. On the facts thus established by the learned master’s findings and approval of the court, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cone v. St. John, 36 A. 415, 180 Pa. 25, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 863 (Pa. 1897).

36 A. 415 (Cone v. St. John) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert J. Sherman v. Ambassador Insurance Company
670 F.2d 251 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)