Cone v. Rittenoure

Fifth Circuit

Cone v. Rittenoure

112 F.2d 167, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4250

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 28, 1940

DocketNos. 9418, 9478

StatusPublished

This text of 112 F.2d 167 (Cone v. Rittenoure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cone v. Rittenoure, 112 F.2d 167, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4250 (5th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

The questions in both of these cases are the same as those decided by this court in the two cases of Rittenoure v. Charlotte County, and Cone v. Rittenoure, 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 476, Feb. 3, 1940.

We find nothing in the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida contrary to said decision. Upon the authority thereof, that portion of the judgment appealed from in each case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with our said decision of Feb. 3, 1940, 109 F.2d 476, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

The questions in both of these cases are the same as those decided by this court in the two cases of Rittenoure v. Charlotte County, and Cone v. Rittenoure, 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 476, Feb. 3, 1940.

We find nothing in the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida contrary to said decision. Upon the authority thereof, that portion of the judgment appealed from in each case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with our said decision of Feb. 3, 1940, 109 F.2d 476, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F.2d 167, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cone-v-rittenoure-ca5-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack