Cone v. Lackawanna Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cone v. Lackawanna Steel Co.

128 A.D. 906, 112 N.Y.S. 1125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D. 906 (Cone v. Lackawanna Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cone v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 128 A.D. 906, 112 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide event. Held, that the court erred in excluding evidence of the contract between the corporations and evidence with reference to the pay roll and the contract and pay check and then holding and charging the jury that deceased was in defendant’s [907]*907employ when the accident and death occurred. (See Kirby v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 109 App. Div. 334.) All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide event. Held, that the court erred in excluding evidence of the contract between the corporations and evidence with reference to the pay roll and the contract and pay check and then holding and charging the jury that deceased was in defendant’s [907]*907employ when the accident and death occurred. (See Kirby v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 109 App. Div. 334.) All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D. 906, 112 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cone-v-lackawanna-steel-co-nyappdiv-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack