Cone v. Benjamin
This text of 33 So. 2d 722 (Cone v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On consideration of petition for certiorari to review an interlocutory order requiring further testimony to be taken and limiting the time for taking such testimony, certiorari is denied without prejudice to the court below to extend the time for taking the testimony as to such matters as the chancellor may indicate to counsel he wishes to hear further testimony or such other testimony as the parties may wish to present.
So ordered.
THOMAS, C. J., and ADAMS, J., think the petition for certiorari should be denied outright and agree only to the conclusion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 So. 2d 722, 160 Fla. 124, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cone-v-benjamin-fla-1948.