Condrey v. Suntrust Bank of Georgia
This text of 97 F. App'x 488 (Condrey v. Suntrust Bank of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We consolidate these appeals. Fed. R.App. P. 3(b)(2). It goes without saying that we must examine the basis of our appellate jurisdiction, sua sponte, if need be. E.g., Smith v. Texas Children’s Hospital, 172 F.3d 923, 925 (5th Cir.1999). These appeals are from the 29 July 2003 judgment signed by the magistrate judge. Because, inter alia, the requisite consent was lacking, the magistrate judge was not authorized to enter the judgment. See 28 [489]*489U.S.C. § 636(c). Therefore there has not been a final judgment in this case, and we are without appellate jurisdiction. See, e.g., Askanase v. Livingwell, Inc., 981 F.2d 807, 809-10 (5th Cir.1993). Accordingly, the appeals are
DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condrey-v-suntrust-bank-of-georgia-ca5-2004.