Condon v. Smith
120 A.2d 460, 20 N.J. 557, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 293
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ereund in the court below.
For affirmance — Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 6.
For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt — 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Condon v. Smith, 120 A.2d 460, 20 N.J. 557, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 293 (N.J. 1956).
120 A.2d 460 (Condon v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peck v. Imedia, Inc.
679 A.2d 745 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Pollack v. Pino's Formal Wear
601 A.2d 1190 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Dee v. Excel Wood Products Co., Inc.
207 A.2d 203 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Petrone v. Kennedy
183 A.2d 124 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Johnson v. US Life Ins. Co.
181 A.2d 380 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Berkeyheiser v. Woolf
176 A.2d 497 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Gross v. Pellicane
167 A.2d 838 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.
157 A.2d 3 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Cerniglia v. Passaic
141 A.2d 558 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)