Condo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Condo v. State

110 So. 3d 84, 2013 WL 842855, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-1718

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 3d 84 (Condo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Condo v. State, 110 So. 3d 84, 2013 WL 842855, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge.

Condo was on probation for failing to comply with sex offender reporting requirements. He was instructed that he could not leave the county of his residence, Hernando, without the permission of his probation officer. Condo was given a permit to travel to New Port Richey, Pasco County, for work purposes only. He was also instructed not to violate the law.

Condo was stopped in Pasco County for driving while license suspended and pled to the lesser charge of no valid driver’s license. When asked by the officer why he was in Pasco County, appellant replied that he was visiting family. He testified at the probation hearing that he was going to visit a friend, a friend he considered a brother, to pick up tools. Condo had no authority to be out of Hernando County for any reason other than work. He admitted he was not heading toward home or work at the time he was stopped.

The trial judge found Condo in willful violation of the provision that restricted his travel out of Hernando County for work purposes only and that he violated the law by driving while license suspended and sentenced him to four and one-half years in prison. The record supports the trial judge’s decision.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge.

Condo was on probation for failing to comply with sex offender reporting requirements. He was instructed that he could not leave the county of his residence, Hernando, without the permission of his probation officer. Condo was given a permit to travel to New Port Richey, Pasco County, for work purposes only. He was also instructed not to violate the law.

Condo was stopped in Pasco County for driving while license suspended and pled to the lesser charge of no valid driver’s license. When asked by the officer why he was in Pasco County, appellant replied that he was visiting family. He testified at the probation hearing that he was going to visit a friend, a friend he considered a brother, to pick up tools. Condo had no authority to be out of Hernando County for any reason other than work. He admitted he was not heading toward home or work at the time he was stopped.

The trial judge found Condo in willful violation of the provision that restricted his travel out of Hernando County for work purposes only and that he violated the law by driving while license suspended and sentenced him to four and one-half years in prison. The record supports the trial judge’s decision.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 3d 84, 2013 WL 842855, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condo-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.