Condinanzo v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Condinanzo v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A.

706 So. 2d 19, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14575, 1997 WL 786687

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 24, 1997

DocketNo. 97-2583

StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 19 (Condinanzo v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Condinanzo v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A., 706 So. 2d 19, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14575, 1997 WL 786687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nelida Condinanzo and the pawn shop that she owns, J.C. Cash, Inc., appeal entry of a default final judgment against them in an action brought by their former counsel, Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A. (law firm), to recover unpaid legal fees. Though properly served with the complaint, Condi-nanzo neglected to answer within the required twenty-day period. The clerk of the court entered default on the twenty-first day after service of the complaint and the trial court entered default final judgment several days later.

Condinanzo claims that she did not answer the complaint due to “excusable neglect” — to wit, extreme emotional upheaval due to numerous legal and personal problems. Further, she claims that her incarceration, which began the day after entry of default, adversely affected her ability to defend the lawsuit. Condinanzo requested that this court set aside the default judgment and remand to the trial court to hear evidence on her “excusable neglect” defense. Alternatively, she requested reversal on the issue of the amount of attorney fees claimed by the law firm in its complaint.

We reject Condinanzo’s request to order a trial on the merits of the “excusable neglect” defense. We do agree, however, that under the instant facts, Condinanzo should have been able to dispute the amount of attorney fees owed. Therefore, we vacate the default final judgment and remand the case to the trial court for trial as to the issue of damages only..

The default final judgment is reversed and remanded for trial on the issue of damages only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nelida Condinanzo and the pawn shop that she owns, J.C. Cash, Inc., appeal entry of a default final judgment against them in an action brought by their former counsel, Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A. (law firm), to recover unpaid legal fees. Though properly served with the complaint, Condi-nanzo neglected to answer within the required twenty-day period. The clerk of the court entered default on the twenty-first day after service of the complaint and the trial court entered default final judgment several days later.

Condinanzo claims that she did not answer the complaint due to “excusable neglect” — to wit, extreme emotional upheaval due to numerous legal and personal problems. Further, she claims that her incarceration, which began the day after entry of default, adversely affected her ability to defend the lawsuit. Condinanzo requested that this court set aside the default judgment and remand to the trial court to hear evidence on her “excusable neglect” defense. Alternatively, she requested reversal on the issue of the amount of attorney fees claimed by the law firm in its complaint.

We reject Condinanzo’s request to order a trial on the merits of the “excusable neglect” defense. We do agree, however, that under the instant facts, Condinanzo should have been able to dispute the amount of attorney fees owed. Therefore, we vacate the default final judgment and remand the case to the trial court for trial as to the issue of damages only..

The default final judgment is reversed and remanded for trial on the issue of damages only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 19, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14575, 1997 WL 786687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condinanzo-v-gregory-a-martin-associates-pa-fladistctapp-1997.