Condinanzo v. Condinanzo

666 So. 2d 561, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13503, 1995 WL 759193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 1995
DocketNo. 95-872
StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 561 (Condinanzo v. Condinanzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Condinanzo v. Condinanzo, 666 So. 2d 561, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13503, 1995 WL 759193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Orbe v. Orbe, 651 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Steadman v. [562]*562Steadman, 645 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orbe v. Orbe
651 So. 2d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Steadman v. Steadman
645 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 So. 2d 561, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13503, 1995 WL 759193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condinanzo-v-condinanzo-fladistctapp-1995.