Condiles v. Otis Elevator Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Condiles v. Otis Elevator Co.

150 N.E.2d 248, 4 N.Y.2d 860, 173 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1090

DecidedApril 3, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.E.2d 248 (Condiles v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Condiles v. Otis Elevator Co., 150 N.E.2d 248, 4 N.Y.2d 860, 173 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1090 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

[862]*862Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye and Froessel. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint against Harold B. Uris and Percy Uris, individually and doing business under the firm name and style of Uris Bros., upon the ground that plaintiff Avas guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

[862]*862Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye and Froessel. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint against Harold B. Uris and Percy Uris, individually and doing business under the firm name and style of Uris Bros., upon the ground that plaintiff Avas guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.E.2d 248, 4 N.Y.2d 860, 173 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 1090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condiles-v-otis-elevator-co-ny-1958.