Conder v. State

9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 278, 1936 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 75
Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided September 10, 1936·No. No. 2890·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Yantis

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant seeks a return of Four ($4.00) Dollars on account of excess payment made by him for an automobile license for a Dodge sedan for the year 1934. The record shows that the horse power of said car was erroneously listed as 27.4 when it should have been 23.4. A report dated May 14, 1936 from the Secretary of State shows that»the statement upon which the claim is based is correct and that claimant paid an excess fee of Four ($4.00) Dollars through said mistake.

Under the ruling heretofore followed, that excess license or franchise payments made by claimant under a mistake of fact will be refunded, claimant is entitled to an award in the present instance. (Martin vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 200.)

An award is therefore made in favor of claimant in the sum of Four ($4.00) Dollars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conder v. State, 9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 278, 1936 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 75 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1936).

9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 278 (Conder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.