Condemnation by Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Condemnation by Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority

442 A.2d 409, 65 Pa. Commw. 336, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1131

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 16, 1982

DocketAppeal, No. 49 T.D. 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 442 A.2d 409 (Condemnation by Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Condemnation by Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority, 442 A.2d 409, 65 Pa. Commw. 336, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1131 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Stephen C. Kehler and Beth A. Kehler, his wife, have appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County sustaining Springettsbury Township’s demurrer to the appellants’ petition for the appointment of viewers.¹ From depositions filed in the court below we learn that as the result of an obstruction by foreign matter in the sanitary sewer line serving the appellants’ dwelling, sewage entered the [338]*338basement of the dwelling. The results of this occurrence were that the appellants were unable to have their meals at home for a day or so and incurred cleanup expenses totalling $296.71. The court decided that the appellants had not suffered a de facto taking. This was clearly correct and we affirm.

It has long been and remains the law of Pennsylvania that an injury which is not the immediate, direct, necessary, and unavoidable consequence of the making of a public improvement by an entity having the power of eminent domain is not a de facto taking. Some of the many cases so holding are: Appeal of Jacobs, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 142, 423 A.2d 442 (1980); Lehan v. Department of Transportation, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 382, 349 A.2d 492 (1975); Condemnation of 2719, 2721, and 2711 East Berkshire Street, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 601, 343 A.2d 67 (1975); Department of Transportation v. Castillo, 14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22, 321 A.2d 394 (1974); Lizza v. City of Uniontown, 345 Pa. 363, 28 A.2d 916 (1942); Stork v. City of Philadelphia, 195 Pa. 101, 45 A. 678 (1900). The incursion of sewage into the appellants’ dwelling was not the necessary and unavoidable consequence of the presence of the township’s sanitary sewer main in the street abutting the appellants’ dwelling; rather, as the depositions taken below show, it was the result of the blockage in the main by foreign material. The appellants ’ remedy is by a delictual action for improper construction or maintenance of the public sewers.

Order affirmed.

Order

And Now, this 16th day of March, 1982, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County made April 2,1981 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Stephen C. Kehler and Beth A. Kehler, his wife, have appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County sustaining Springettsbury Township’s demurrer to the appellants’ petition for the appointment of viewers.¹ From depositions filed in the court below we learn that as the result of an obstruction by foreign matter in the sanitary sewer line serving the appellants’ dwelling, sewage entered the [338]*338basement of the dwelling. The results of this occurrence were that the appellants were unable to have their meals at home for a day or so and incurred cleanup expenses totalling $296.71. The court decided that the appellants had not suffered a de facto taking. This was clearly correct and we affirm.

It has long been and remains the law of Pennsylvania that an injury which is not the immediate, direct, necessary, and unavoidable consequence of the making of a public improvement by an entity having the power of eminent domain is not a de facto taking. Some of the many cases so holding are: Appeal of Jacobs, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 142, 423 A.2d 442 (1980); Lehan v. Department of Transportation, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 382, 349 A.2d 492 (1975); Condemnation of 2719, 2721, and 2711 East Berkshire Street, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 601, 343 A.2d 67 (1975); Department of Transportation v. Castillo, 14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22, 321 A.2d 394 (1974); Lizza v. City of Uniontown, 345 Pa. 363, 28 A.2d 916 (1942); Stork v. City of Philadelphia, 195 Pa. 101, 45 A. 678 (1900). The incursion of sewage into the appellants’ dwelling was not the necessary and unavoidable consequence of the presence of the township’s sanitary sewer main in the street abutting the appellants’ dwelling; rather, as the depositions taken below show, it was the result of the blockage in the main by foreign material. The appellants ’ remedy is by a delictual action for improper construction or maintenance of the public sewers.

Order affirmed.

Order

And Now, this 16th day of March, 1982, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County made April 2,1981 is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 A.2d 409, 65 Pa. Commw. 336, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condemnation-by-springettsbury-township-sewer-authority-pacommwct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack