Conde v. Full House, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conde v. Full House, Inc.

206 So. 2d 22, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5422

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 27, 1967

DocketNo. 67-726

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 206 So. 2d 22 (Conde v. Full House, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conde v. Full House, Inc., 206 So. 2d 22, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Manuel S. Conde, challenges the propriety of two interlocutory orders entered by the court below.

The first order discharged appellee and its surety from their obligations under a bond which had been posted in order to obtain an “emergency injunction without notice” against the appellant. The trial judge found that the emergency injunction without notice had been entered properly.

Subsequently, the appellant was adjudged in contempt of court for failure to comply with a prior order of the trial court. The contempt order permitted appellant to purge himself of the contempt order by compliance with its terms, within thirty days, by the delivery of certain personal property to the appellees.

We find that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the finding and adjudication holding appellant in contempt of court.

The appeal from the other interlocutory order is dismissed, sua sponte. See Morris v. Rabara, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 265; Bronk v. Bronk, 46 Fla. 474, 35 So. 870 (1903).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI