Condaras v. Condaras
This text of 252 A.D. 871 (Condaras v. Condaras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, [872]*872Borough of Richmond (Family Court), denying appellant’s motion to vacate the warrant and to dismiss the petition, reversed on the law, warrant vacated and petition dismissed. Upon the facts shown, the court, under section 103 of the Domestic Relations Court Act, did not have jurisdiction to issue the warrant, because the petition and the proof do not show that prior to the filing of the petition appellant either failed to support his wife and child or abandoned them while he was residing or domiciled in the city of New York. (Matter of Fleming v. Fleming, 242 App. Div. 690.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 871, 299 N.Y.S. 958, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condaras-v-condaras-nyappdiv-1937.