Concrete Design Struc., Inc. v. Pl Dodge Found, Inc.

532 So. 2d 1334, 1988 WL 114735
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1988
Docket88-192
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 532 So. 2d 1334 (Concrete Design Struc., Inc. v. Pl Dodge Found, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Concrete Design Struc., Inc. v. Pl Dodge Found, Inc., 532 So. 2d 1334, 1988 WL 114735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

532 So.2d 1334 (1988)

CONCRETE DESIGN STRUCTURES, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Robert L. Lapp, Appellants,
v.
P.L. DODGE FOUNDATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, and New Dodge Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Individually and As Assignee of the Rights of P.L. Dodge Foundation, Inc. Appellees.

No. 88-192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 1, 1988.

Miles J. Gopman, Miramar, for appellants.

Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack & Brumbaugh and Sally R. Doerner, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ., and COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The single issue presented for review is whether filing a counterclaim and motion *1335 to dismiss the complaint at the same time a motion to compel arbitration is filed, without more, waives the contractual right to arbitrate. We hold that it does not. See Wieneke v. Raymond, James & Assocs., 495 So.2d 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Ziegler v. Knuck, 419 So.2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); and Genstar S. Dev. Corp. v. Troup Bros., 396 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Coral 97 Assocs., Ltd. v. Chino Elec., Inc., 501 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), the case relied on by the appellees, is distinguishable. In Coral 97 it was the act of implementing discovery, following the simultaneous filings of the counterclaim and motions to arbitrate and dismiss, that was held inconsistent with and thus a waiver of the arbitration right. Id. at 70-71.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to order arbitration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andre Franklin, Inc. v. Wax
150 So. 3d 815 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Price v. Fax Recovery System, Inc.
49 So. 3d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Waterhouse Const. Group v. 5891 Sw 64th St.
949 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Epiphany South Miami 602 A Enterprises, Inc. v. Waterhouse Construction Group, Inc.
947 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer v. Macro Capital Corp.
818 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Avid Engineering, Inc. v. Orlando Marketplace Ltd.
809 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Presley v. Szerdi
708 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 So. 2d 1334, 1988 WL 114735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concrete-design-struc-inc-v-pl-dodge-found-inc-fladistctapp-1988.