Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.

433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1983
DocketNos. 81-1896, 81-2180
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 433 So. 2d 50 (Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co., 433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The resolution of factual conflicts by a trial judge in a nonjury case will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). There is substantial record evidence, although conflicting, to support the findings on both the complaint and the counterclaim.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvaro Ignacio Abaunza v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Clegg v. Chipola Aviation, Inc.
458 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concreform-systems-inc-v-rm-hicks-construction-co-fladistctapp-1983.