Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.
This text of 433 So. 2d 50 (Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The resolution of factual conflicts by a trial judge in a nonjury case will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). There is substantial record evidence, although conflicting, to support the findings on both the complaint and the counterclaim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concreform-systems-inc-v-rm-hicks-construction-co-fladistctapp-1983.