Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.

433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1983·No. Nos. 81-1896, 81-2180·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The resolution of factual conflicts by a trial judge in a nonjury case will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). There is substantial record evidence, although conflicting, to support the findings on both the complaint and the counterclaim.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The resolution of factual conflicts by a trial judge in a nonjury case will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). There is substantial record evidence, although conflicting, to support the findings on both the complaint and the counterclaim.

Affirmed.

Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co., 433 So. 2d 50, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

433 So. 2d 50 (Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related