Concreform Co. v. Mander
This text of 194 So. 2d 901 (Concreform Co. v. Mander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date March 18, 1966, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.
The attorney for respondent Albert J. Mander is awarded a fee in the amount of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350) for services in this court
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 So. 2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concreform-co-v-mander-fla-1967.