Concordia Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC

103 So. 3d 566, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 442, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1321, 2012 WL 5238276
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 24, 2012·No. No. 12-422·Published

Opinion

GENOVESE, Judge.

Lin this sales and use tax case, Defendant, Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC (LMR), appeals the grant of a partial summary judgment enforcing the assessment of the taxing authorities, Plaintiffs, Con-cordia Parish School Board, Concordia Parish Hospital District # 1, Concordia Parish Police Jury, City of Vidalia, and Town of Ferriday.1 Plaintiffs have answered the appeal seeking sanctions against LMR for filing a frivolous appeal. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s grant of the partial summary judgment; we deny the claim for damages for frivolous appeal; and, we remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

LMR, an entity forming part of Louisiana’s exclusive Caterpillar franchise dealers, sold, leased, and repaired Caterpillar equipment and machinery in Concordia Parish. The Concordia Parish School Board, Concordia Parish Hospital District # 1, Concordia Parish Police Jury, City of Vidalia, and Town of Ferriday designated the Concordia Parish School Board (the Collector) as their sales and use tax collector.

The Collector commissioned a private auditing firm to perform an audit of LMR which revealed deficiencies for the period December 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007. The Collector, thereafter, initiated the collection process on November 24, 2009, by sending LMR a Notice of Intent to Assess additional taxes, penalties, and interest in accordance with La.R.S. 47:337.48.2 LMR [568] neither protested the Notice of Intent to Assess, nor did it request a hearing.

IzThe Collector then issued a formal Notice of Assessment (also referred to as the Original Assessment) to LMR on December 24, 2009, allegedly in accordance with La.R.S. 47:337.51 in effect in 2009 before ⅛6 2010 amendment to subsections A and B.3 Upon receipt of this notice, LMR did [569] not pay the |sassessment, respond in protest, or request a hearing. Instead, LMR provided additional tax records to the auditors that they had previously withheld.

The Collector reviewed the additional audit documentation and subsequently affirmed its findings. On February 22, 2010, the Collector reissued a second formal Notice of Assessment-Extension (sometimes referred to as the First Revised Assessment) to LMR in accordance with La.R.S. 47:337.51. The First Revised Assessment extended additional time to LMR to raise either factual or legal objections. It did not do so.

After receiving the First Revised Assessment, LMR again submitted additional records to the auditors. After the auditors reviewed this newly supplied information, the assessment was substantially reduced. The Collector then issued a third formal Notice of Assessment-Extension (sometimes referred to as the Second Revised Assessment) to LMR on April 26, 2010. LMR did not respond to the ^Second Revised Assessment. Consequently, on September 24, 2010, the Collector instituted the present proceeding by filing a Rule for Payment of Sales Tax against LMR for payment of taxes, penalties, interest, and attorney fees pursuant to La.R.S. 47:337.61.4

[570] |fiLMR responded by filing exceptions, affirmative defenses, and an answer. Thereafter, and with leave of court, the Collector filed a Supplemental and Amending Petition for Rule to Show Cause in Summary Sales and Use Tax Proceeding. In addition, the Collector filed an exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and an exception of preemption in response to LMR’s exceptions, affirmative defenses, and answer. The Collector also filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Responding to the supplemental petition, LMR again raised exceptions, affirmative defenses, and filed an answer thereto.

On January 5, 2012, the trial court held a hearing only on the motion for partial summary judgment. Based upon its determination that the April 26, 2010 Second Revised Assessment was final, the trial court granted partial summary judgment against LMR in favor of the Collector. LMR appealed, and the Collector answered the appeal, seeking sanctions for frivolous appeal.

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

On appeal, LMR assigns four errors by the trial court. It first asserts that the trial court erred in failing to find that the Notice of Assessment-Extension did not comply with La.R.S. 47:837.51(A), thereby making said notice invalid and void. LMR next asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that the requirements of La. R.S. 47:337.51(A) need not be specifically enumerated in this case since the taxpayer was a large company. LMR further asserts that the trial court erred in failing to find that the claim for taxes had prescribed prior to the issuance of the Notice of Assessment-Extension. Finally, it contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion for partial summary judgment because the affidavit filed in support thereof was not based on personal knowledge and that genuine issues of material fact as to the amount of taxes owed by LMR remain in dispute.

\MW AND DISCUSSION

The facts, issues, assignments of error, and briefs are identical to those set forth in Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC, 12-443, 12-444 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/24/12), 105 So.3d 169. For the reasons this day assigned in Catahoula, this matter is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Additionally, for the reasons assigned therein, we have found LMR’s appeal to be meritorious; therefore, the appeal is not frivolous. Thus, we deny the Collector’s request for sanctions for frivolous appeal.

DECREE

The trial court’s grant of the partial summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs, Concordia Parish School Board, Con-cordia Parish Hospital District # 1, Con-cordia Parish Police Jury, City of Yidalia, and the Town of Ferriday, against Defendant, Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC, is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith. Additionally, Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC’s request for damages and attorney fees for frivolous appeal is denied. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Concordia Parish School Board, Concordia Parish Hospital District # 1, Concordia Parish Police Jury, City of [571] Vidalia, and the Town of Ferriday in the amount of $2,223.50 pursuant to La.R.S. 13:5112.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concordia Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC, 103 So. 3d 566, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 442, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1321, 2012 WL 5238276 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

103 So. 3d 566 (Concordia Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC
105 So. 3d 169 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.
124 So. 848 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)