Concord Oil Corp. v. York Heat Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Concord Oil Corp. v. York Heat Service, Inc.

262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 758 (Concord Oil Corp. v. York Heat Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concord Oil Corp. v. York Heat Service, Inc., 262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for the agreed price of goods sold and delivered, order denying defendant’s motion to open its default and to vacate the judgment entered, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted to the extent of vacating defendant’s default, without costs, on condition that the judgment entered stand as security, and that the case be restored to the trial calendar for the June term and tried at that term, subject to the approval of the justice presiding. Appeal from the inquest and judgment dismissed, without costs. In view of the serious illness of defendant’s president, who was a necessary and material witness, the defendant, in our opinion, was entitled to an adjournment of the trial, and it was an improper exercise of discretion to direct that an inquest be taken. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for the agreed price of goods sold and delivered, order denying defendant’s motion to open its default and to vacate the judgment entered, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted to the extent of vacating defendant’s default, without costs, on condition that the judgment entered stand as security, and that the case be restored to the trial calendar for the June term and tried at that term, subject to the approval of the justice presiding. Appeal from the inquest and judgment dismissed, without costs. In view of the serious illness of defendant’s president, who was a necessary and material witness, the defendant, in our opinion, was entitled to an adjournment of the trial, and it was an improper exercise of discretion to direct that an inquest be taken. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-oil-corp-v-york-heat-service-inc-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack