Concord Baptist Church of Christ v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Concord Baptist Church of Christ v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

249 A.D.2d 258, 670 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3778

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 258 (Concord Baptist Church of Christ v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concord Baptist Church of Christ v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, 249 A.D.2d 258, 670 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiff from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated May 28, 1996, and (2) an order of the same court, dated March 4, 1997, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 4, 1997, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Aronin at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the plaintiff from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated May 28, 1996, and (2) an order of the same court, dated March 4, 1997, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 4, 1997, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Aronin at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 258, 670 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-baptist-church-of-christ-v-automobile-insurance-co-of-hartford-nyappdiv-1998.