Concolino v. Kunzelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Concolino v. Kunzelman

234 A.D. 729

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 729 (Concolino v. Kunzelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concolino v. Kunzelman, 234 A.D. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that plaintiff’s disobedience of the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, of the Vehicle and Trafile Law was negligence as matter of law contributing to the accident, and in any event the verdict exonerating the plaintiff from contributory [730]*730negligence was in this respect against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that plaintiff’s disobedience of the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, of the Vehicle and Trafile Law was negligence as matter of law contributing to the accident, and in any event the verdict exonerating the plaintiff from contributory [730]*730negligence was in this respect against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concolino-v-kunzelman-nyappdiv-1931.