Concho, S. S. & L. v. Ry. Co. v. Kennedy

146 S.W. 345
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1912·Published

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1] 1. Appellant contends that the county court of Tom Green county was without jurisdiction to hear and determine this cause, for the reason that the statutory lien is given upon real estate. It is true that the' statute (Rev. St. 1895, arts. 3312-3315) gives, a lien upon the railroad, and that the right of way of a railroad is real estate, but it also gives such lien upon the equipments of the railroad. If any' doubt could be entertained that locomotives and cars are equipments of a railroad within the meaning of the statute, this doubt would be dispelled by an examination of article 3312 of the Bevised Statutes, which uses the language: “Any railroad locomotive, car or other equipment of a railroad.” The appellee did not seek a foreclosure upon the right of way or other real estate of the railway company, as is shown by his petition. Appellant cites in support of its contention Railway Co. v. Barnett, 55 S. W. 986. Nothing more was decided in that case as to the issue here involved than that the right of way of a railway company is real estate. Appellant also cites Railway Co. v. Allen, 1 White & W. Civ. Cas. Ct. App. § 572. The holding in that case is that the statute does not give a lien upon any of the personal property of a railroad, except its equipments.

[2] 2. We agree with the holding in Bail-way Co. v. Allen, supra, and for this reason we here reverse the judgment of the trial court in so far as it adjudges a lien against the personal property of appellant, other than its rolling stock and movable equipments, and in that respect judgment is here rendered for appellant. Said judgment for the sum of $299.67 against W. A. Worth, and, in so far as it forecloses appellee’s statutory lien on the rolling stock and movable equipments of the Concho, San Saba & Llano Valley Bailway Company, is here affirmed.- The costs of this appeal will be adjudged against appellee. •

Beversed and rendered in part, and in part affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concho, S. S. & L. v. Ry. Co. v. Kennedy, 146 S.W. 345 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

146 S.W. 345 (Concho, S. S. & L. v. Ry. Co. v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.