Conchita J. v. Scopetta

273 A.D.2d 238, 709 N.Y.S.2d 834, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6258
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Salintro, J.), dated May 24, 1999, which, after a hearing, denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A writ of habeas corpus is not the proper procedure to seek review of the Family Court’s fact-finding order of neglect entered upon the mother’s default (see, People ex rel. Backus v Broome County Dept. of Social Servs., 240 AD2d 786, 787-788; Matter of Eddie J., 273 AD2d 239 [decided herewith]). The proper procedure is to move to vacate the fact-finding order, and if the motion is denied, to appeal from the order denying the motion [239]*239(see, Matter of Vanessa M., 263 AD2d 542; Matter of Hurst v Hurst, 227 AD2d 689). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conchita J. v. Scopetta, 273 A.D.2d 238, 709 N.Y.S.2d 834, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 238 (Conchita J. v. Scopetta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Mills v. Holley
2024 NY Slip Op 01547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Palmiotti v. Piscitelli
100 A.D.3d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)