Concerned Tenants of 823 Park Avenue v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Concerned Tenants of 823 Park Avenue v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

284 A.D.2d 269, 726 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 269 (Concerned Tenants of 823 Park Avenue v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concerned Tenants of 823 Park Avenue v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 284 A.D.2d 269, 726 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered February 7, 2001, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to comply with the petitioner’s request for documents pursuant to the State Freedom of Information Law, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

DHCR, having received in the order and judgment from which it purports to appeal the full relief that it had sought in responding to petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78, is not aggrieved by the order and judgment and, accordingly, is not a permissible appellant (see, CPLR 5511; T.D. v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 91 NY2d 860, 862). We note that no appeal has been taken from the subject order and judgment by petitioner. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered February 7, 2001, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to comply with the petitioner’s request for documents pursuant to the State Freedom of Information Law, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

DHCR, having received in the order and judgment from which it purports to appeal the full relief that it had sought in responding to petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78, is not aggrieved by the order and judgment and, accordingly, is not a permissible appellant (see, CPLR 5511; T.D. v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 91 NY2d 860, 862). We note that no appeal has been taken from the subject order and judgment by petitioner. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 269, 726 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concerned-tenants-of-823-park-avenue-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack