Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental Protection

660 A.2d 356, 234 Conn. 913, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 273

DecidedJune 26, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 660 A.2d 356 (Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental Protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental Protection, 660 A.2d 356, 234 Conn. 913, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 273 (Colo. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14423) is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I disagree and would grant certification to appeal on the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court improperly dismiss as moot this appeal from the issuance of certain environmental permits when (1) the mootness claim was based solely on the defendant developer’s destruction, while the appeal was pending, of the natural resources the plaintiffs had [914]*914sought to protect, (2) there was no evidence to allow the court to conclude that the damage could not be rectified, and (3) the dismissal denied the plaintiffs any opportunity for relief?”

Decided June 26, 1995 Michael A. Zizka, in support of the petition. David B. Losee, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14423) is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I disagree and would grant certification to appeal on the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court improperly dismiss as moot this appeal from the issuance of certain environmental permits when (1) the mootness claim was based solely on the defendant developer’s destruction, while the appeal was pending, of the natural resources the plaintiffs had [914]*914sought to protect, (2) there was no evidence to allow the court to conclude that the damage could not be rectified, and (3) the dismissal denied the plaintiffs any opportunity for relief?”

Decided June 26, 1995 Michael A. Zizka, in support of the petition. David B. Losee, in opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 A.2d 356, 234 Conn. 913, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concerned-citizens-v-department-of-environmental-protection-conn-1995.