Concept Dev. Group Vs. Siegel
This text of Concept Dev. Group Vs. Siegel (Concept Dev. Group Vs. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, A No. 80708 NEVADA SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, Appellant, vs. JORDAN SIEGEL, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEC 0 7 2020 Res ondent. CLERv OF lzkEVE COURT BY - DEPuTY CLEki<
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. As the stipulation does not appear to be signed by counsel of record for respondent, it is treated as a motion and granted as such. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROW
BY:
cc: Hon. Tirnothy C. Williams, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Walsh & Friedman, Ltd. Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC Holley Driggs/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
iwn
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Concept Dev. Group Vs. Siegel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concept-dev-group-vs-siegel-nev-2020.