Concepcion v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot. Agency

134 S. Ct. 2142, 188 L. Ed. 2d 1121, 572 U.S. 1097, 82 U.S.L.W. 3651, 2014 WL 939861, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3289
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 5, 2014·No. No. 13–9067.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal *2143matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concepcion v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot. Agency, 134 S. Ct. 2142, 188 L. Ed. 2d 1121, 572 U.S. 1097, 82 U.S.L.W. 3651, 2014 WL 939861, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3289 (U.S. 2014).

134 S. Ct. 2142 (Concepcion v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot. Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)