Concepcion v. Tojeiro

457 So. 2d 553, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 210, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2188, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15347
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1984·No. No. 84-421·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where a note is made payable to two or more payees in the conjunctive, payment made to only one of the payees does not discharge the maker’s obligations under the note. § 673.116, Fla.Stat. (1983).1 In the instant case the note was made payable to the appellant and a co-payee and payment by the Tojeiros was made only to the co-payee. Appellant did not give the co-payee authority to accept payment on her behalf and no such authority will be implied from a close relationship between the appellant and the co-payee. Glasser v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Association of Miami Shores, 197 So.2d 6 (Fla.1967).

The judgment below is therefore reversed and the case remanded with directions that judgment be entered for the appellant, plaintiff below.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concepcion v. Tojeiro, 457 So. 2d 553, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 210, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2188, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

457 So. 2d 553 (Concepcion v. Tojeiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shada v. Title & Trust Co. of Fla.
457 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)