Concepcion v. State

19 So. 3d 405, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13194, 2009 WL 2870034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Concepcion v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 2009·No. 3D09-1851·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Yabel Concepcion has raised a facially sufficient claim for rule 3.850 relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach *406 written portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant’s claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this Court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concepcion v. State, 19 So. 3d 405, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13194, 2009 WL 2870034 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 405 (Concepcion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.