Concepcion Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2011·No. 09-73777·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED CONCEPCION CARRILLO, No. 09-73777 DEC 01 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

Petitioner, Agency No. A076-804-563 C O U R T OF APPE ALS U .S.

v.

ORDER AMENDING

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, MEMORANDUM

Respondent.

Before: GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ,* District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed June 21, 2011, is amended as follows:

On page 2, last paragraph, lines 1-2, change "In light of our decision in Carrillo de Palacios v. Holder, No. 09-72059, filed this date," to "In light of our decision in Carrillo de Palacios v. Holder, No. 09-72059, filed simultaneously with this amended memorandum disposition,".

The filing of a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc shall remain due within 14 days after the mandate issues in Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder, No. 09-72603.

*

The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concepcion Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2011).

Concepcion Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Concepcion Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.