Conca v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conca v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.

269 A.D. 814, 55 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3977

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant should have been permitted to establish instructions to its truck driver not to allow other persons to ride on the truck. For the exclusion of such evidence the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered (Psota v. Long Island R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 388; Goldberg v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Co., 227 N. Y. 345).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Martin, P. J., Glerinon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant should have been permitted to establish instructions to its truck driver not to allow other persons to ride on the truck. For the exclusion of such evidence the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered (Psota v. Long Island R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 388; Goldberg v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Co., 227 N. Y. 345).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Martin, P. J., Glerinon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Conca v. Cushman's Sons, Inc., 269 A.D. 814, 55 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 814 (Conca v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related