Conboy v. Felton

68 A.D.3d 1601, 891 N.Y.2d 700
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1601 (Conboy v. Felton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conboy v. Felton, 68 A.D.3d 1601, 891 N.Y.2d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.

Petitioner was hired as a probationary State Trooper in May 2006. Before the expiration of his probationary period, he was notified that he would not be offered a permanent position and that his employment was being terminated immediately. He commenced this proceeding seeking reinstatement together with back pay and benefits. Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner appeals.

[1602]*1602We affirm. “A probationary police officer may be discharged for ‘almost any reason, or for no reason at all’ as long as it is not ‘in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason’ ” (Matter of Duncan v Kelly, 9 NY3d 1024, 1025 [2008], quoting Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762 [1999]). During'his probationary term, petitioner was found, following an investigation, to have violated several regulations of the State Police, including ones related to the improper use of his firearm. Also, multiple complaints were lodged against him by members of the public for aggressive, disrespectful and condescending actions while on patrol. His poor communication skills resulted in extended training, after which he still exhibited less than satisfactory abilities. The evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the discharge was made in good faith and petitioner failed to establish a material issue of fact indicating that he was discharged for an impermissible reason (see Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649, 650 [1986]).

Cardona, EJ., Spain, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Solomon v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.
2019 NY Slip Op 1692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Messenger v. State of New York Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
2017 NY Slip Op 5145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1601, 891 N.Y.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conboy-v-felton-nyappdiv-2009.