Conboy v. Cunningham

New York Supreme Court

Conboy v. Cunningham

24 N.Y.S. 75, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 935

DecidedJuly 8, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.Y.S. 75 (Conboy v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conboy v. Cunningham, 24 N.Y.S. 75, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 935 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

The alleged errors sought to be reviewed upon this appeal are those claimed to have been made by the referee in making and stating the accounts between the parties for rents collected, and commissions charged for their collection, and for moneys disbursed. The action is for a partition of land of which the parties were tenants in common. The alleged errors are errors of fact. The evidence as to rents collected and moneys paid out is not entirely satisfactory, but the referee had the witnesses before him in person, and heard their statements as to the manner in which they made out their accounts. I see no reason for believing that we could reach a conclusion any more satisfactory than the one at which he has arrived. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs of this appeal to be deducted from the share of the appellant in the proceeds of sale. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HERRICK, J.

The alleged errors sought to be reviewed upon this appeal are those claimed to have been made by the referee in making and stating the accounts between the parties for rents collected, and commissions charged for their collection, and for moneys disbursed. The action is for a partition of land of which the parties were tenants in common. The alleged errors are errors of fact. The evidence as to rents collected and moneys paid out is not entirely satisfactory, but the referee had the witnesses before him in person, and heard their statements as to the manner in which they made out their accounts. I see no reason for believing that we could reach a conclusion any more satisfactory than the one at which he has arrived. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs of this appeal to be deducted from the share of the appellant in the proceeds of sale. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 N.Y.S. 75, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conboy-v-cunningham-nysupct-1893.