Conboy v. City of Laporte

186 N.E. 298, 205 Ind. 711, 1933 Ind. LEXIS 131
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 1933
DocketNo. 25,829.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 N.E. 298 (Conboy v. City of Laporte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conboy v. City of Laporte, 186 N.E. 298, 205 Ind. 711, 1933 Ind. LEXIS 131 (Ind. 1933).

Opinion

Fansler, J.

This is an action by the appellant in which he alleges that a portion of his salary as city attorney of the City of LaPorte, Indiana, for the years 1918 to 1925, inclusive, has not been paid, and seeking to recover the balance. He alleges that he drew a salary of $700.00 per year, and that the minimum salary fixed by law for said office was $1,000.00 per year.

LaPorte was a city of the fourth class during all of the time involved. The minimum salary for city attorneys of cities of the third class was $1,000.00, and appellant contends that he was entitled to be paid the minimum salary provided for like officers in cities of the third class.

All of the questions involved are decided in the case of Herman W. Sallwasser v. City of LaPorte (1933), ante 248, 186 N. E. 297, and upon the authority of that ease judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers v. State
510 N.E.2d 1360 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 298, 205 Ind. 711, 1933 Ind. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conboy-v-city-of-laporte-ind-1933.