Conaway v. Weaver

1 Smith & H. 142
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1848·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.

— '• These statements by the clerk, so far, at least, as they purport to disclose, the grounds upon, which the Court acted in dismissing the appeal, are not legitimate]}7' a part of the record, and cannot be regarded. Blany v. Findlay, 2 Blackf. 338; Wilson v. Coles, id. 402; Ross v. Misner, 3 id. 362; Richardson v. St. Joseph's Iron Co., 5 id. 149. We are, therefore, only informed that the, Circuit Court dismissed the appeal, and as there is no bill of exceptions showing the reasons of the Court for so doing, they must be presumed to have been sufficient.”

Judgment affirmed, &c„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conaway v. Weaver, 1 Smith & H. 142 (Ind. 1848).

1 Smith & H. 142 (Conaway v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blaney v. Findley
2 Blackf. 338 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1830)