Conaway v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Conaway v. State

93 S.W.2d 726, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 22, 1936

DocketNo. 18232

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.W.2d 726 (Conaway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conaway v. State, 93 S.W.2d 726, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for passing a forged instrument. In addition to charging such offense, it was alleged in the indictment that appellant had theretofore been convicted of other felonies, bringing him within the condemnation of the habitual criminal statute. See article 63, P.C. Punishment assessed ' was imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bill$' of'.exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for passing a forged instrument. In addition to charging such offense, it was alleged in the indictment that appellant had theretofore been convicted of other felonies, bringing him within the condemnation of the habitual criminal statute. See article 63, P.C. Punishment assessed ' was imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bill$' of'.exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.W.2d 726, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conaway-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.