Conaway v. Nickles

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Conaway v. Nickles

767 So. 2d 1120, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 227, 2000 WL 337540

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conaway v. Nickles. Read the opinion of the Court — 767 So. 2d 1116 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 31, 2000·No. 2970414·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of January 7, 2000, 767 So.2d 1117 (Ala.2000), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of January 7, 2000, 767 So.2d 1117 (Ala.2000), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Conaway v. Nickles, 767 So. 2d 1120, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 227, 2000 WL 337540 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

767 So. 2d 1120 (Conaway v. Nickles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related