Conard v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'n

93 N.Y.S. 626, 101 A.D. 611
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 4, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the decision at special term, and because of the misjoinder of parties plaintiff (Nagel v. Lutz, 41 App. Div. 193, 58 N. Y. Supp. 816), judgment affirmed, with costs, and leave is granted to sever the action, pursuant to section 497 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on payment of the costs as stated in the interlocutory judgment and of this appeal. All concur, except HOUGHTON, J., who dissents as to misjoinder of plaintiffs, and concurs in sustaining demurrer as to third cause of action only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conard v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'n, 93 N.Y.S. 626, 101 A.D. 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

93 N.Y.S. 626 (Conard v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stolorow v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security
155 N.W. 756 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)
Truesdell v. Erie Railroad
119 A.D. 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)