Conant v. Burns

19 A. 11, 66 N.H. 99
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 19 A. 11 (Conant v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conant v. Burns, 19 A. 11, 66 N.H. 99 (N.H. 1889).

Opinion

Clark, J.

If the question of costs is open to revision (G. L., c. 249, s. 49; Nutter v. Varney, 64 N. H. 334) the plaintiff is not entitled to costs against the trustee. The trustee was the prevailing party. Upon his deposition he was chargeable for the board of the horse after February 28, 1887, and the jury found him chargeable for no more. The fact that by reason of the lapse of time the board amounted to a larger sum at the time of the verdict than when the deposition was given does not make the trustee chargeable with costs under G. L., c. 249, s. 26.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blair v. Allen C. Edwards Realty Co.
405 P.2d 538 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Overton v. Board of County Commissioners
162 A.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)
Talles v. Rifman
53 A.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1947)
Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Lomas and Nettleton Co.
5 A.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1939)
West v. Probst
6 S.W.2d 96 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Ludgate v. Somerville
256 P. 1043 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Castleman v. Avignone
12 F.2d 326 (D.C. Circuit, 1926)
Ronberg v. Smith
232 P. 283 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)
American Cannel Coal Co. v. Indiana Cotton Mills
134 N.E. 891 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A. 11, 66 N.H. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conant-v-burns-nh-1889.