Conant v. Bicknell
1 D. Chip. 50, 1 N. Chip. 34
Opinion
It was held by the Court, that money, collected by an officer on an execution, cannot be attached out of his hands. On the receipt, the officer becomes a debtor to the plaintiff, not for the identical pieces of money, but for the sum.
Verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conant v. Bicknell, 1 D. Chip. 50, 1 N. Chip. 34 (Vt. 1790).
1 D. Chip. 50 (Conant v. Bicknell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. Lane
38 Vt. 640 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1866)
McMeekin v. State
4 Ark. 553 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1849)
Prentiss v. Bliss
4 Vt. 513 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1832)