Conant v. Bicknell
1 D. Chip. 50, 1 N. Chip. 34
This text of 1 D. Chip. 50 (Conant v. Bicknell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conant v. Bicknell, 1 D. Chip. 50, 1 N. Chip. 34 (Vt. 1790).
Opinion
It was held by the Court, that money, collected by an officer on an execution, cannot be attached out of his hands. On the receipt, the officer becomes a debtor to the plaintiff, not for the identical pieces of money, but for the sum.
Verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Adams v. Lane
38 Vt. 640 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1866)
McMeekin v. State
4 Ark. 553 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1849)
Prentiss v. Bliss
4 Vt. 513 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1832)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D. Chip. 50, 1 N. Chip. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conant-v-bicknell-vt-1790.