Comstock v. Wilson

232 A.D. 720

This text of 232 A.D. 720 (Comstock v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comstock v. Wilson, 232 A.D. 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs upon the authority of Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co. (162 App. Div. 791): All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon the ground that in their opinion under the charge of the court and the court’s refusal to charge, the law as stated in Mitchell v. Rochester R. R. Co. (151 N. Y. 107) and O’Brien v. Moss (220 App. Div. 464) is controlling. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, ThompsonYracTCrosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.
45 N.E. 354 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.
162 A.D. 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
O'Brien v. Moss
220 A.D. 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comstock-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1931.