Comstock v. Wilson
232 A.D. 720
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs upon the authority of Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co. (162 App. Div. 791): All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon the ground that in their opinion under the charge of the court and the court’s refusal to charge, the law as stated in Mitchell v. Rochester R. R. Co. (151 N. Y. 107) and O’Brien v. Moss (220 App. Div. 464) is controlling. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, ThompsonYracTCrosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Comstock v. Wilson, 232 A.D. 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
232 A.D. 720 (Comstock v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.
45 N.E. 354 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.
162 A.D. 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
O'Brien v. Moss
220 A.D. 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)