Comstock v. Carr
6 Wend. 526
Opinion
Judgment of non-pross by an infant defendant set aside, because he defend" ed by attorney, instead of guardian.
The defendant, an infant, appeared by attorney and obtained judgment of non-pross. The plaintiff moved to set aside the judgment on the ground that the defence should have been made by guardian. Motion granted, but without costs, as the plaintiff might have compelled a defence by guardian,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Comstock v. Carr, 6 Wend. 526 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
6 Wend. 526 (Comstock v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duffus v. Howard Furnace Co.
8 A.D. 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
McMurray v. McMurray
9 Abb. Pr. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)
Cavender v. Heirs of Smith
5 Iowa 157 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1857)
Wrisley v. Kenyon
28 Vt. 5 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1855)