Comstock v. Carr

New York Supreme Court

Comstock v. Carr

6 Wend. 526

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1831

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 526 (Comstock v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comstock v. Carr, 6 Wend. 526 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of non-pross by an infant defendant set aside, because he defend" ed by attorney, instead of guardian.

The defendant, an infant, appeared by attorney and obtained judgment of non-pross. The plaintiff moved to set aside the judgment on the ground that the defence should have been made by guardian. Motion granted, but without costs, as the plaintiff might have compelled a defence by guardian,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of non-pross by an infant defendant set aside, because he defend" ed by attorney, instead of guardian.

The defendant, an infant, appeared by attorney and obtained judgment of non-pross. The plaintiff moved to set aside the judgment on the ground that the defence should have been made by guardian. Motion granted, but without costs, as the plaintiff might have compelled a defence by guardian,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Wend. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comstock-v-carr-nysupct-1831.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack