Comstock v. Beeman

221 N.E.2d 564, 18 N.Y.2d 772
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1966·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

18 N.Y.2d 772 (1966)

Diane G. Comstock, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Philip E. Comstock, et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
Lyman A. Beeman, Jr., Appellant, John J. Howe, Respondent, and Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued September 28, 1966.
Decided October 18, 1966.

James M. Conboy, James S. Carter and M. James Conboy for defendant-appellant.

J. Robert La Pann for plaintiffs-appellants.

Louis M. Carusone for defendant-respondent.

Francis J. Holloway for Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comstock v. Beeman, 221 N.E.2d 564, 18 N.Y.2d 772 (N.Y. 1966).

221 N.E.2d 564 (Comstock v. Beeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernard v. Mumuni
22 A.D.3d 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Schrader v. Carney
180 A.D.2d 200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brice
72 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Lincoln v. Austic
60 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)