Computerized Medical Imaging Equipment, Inc. v. Diasonics Ultrasound, Inc.

278 A.D.2d 946, 718 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13481
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 946 (Computerized Medical Imaging Equipment, Inc. v. Diasonics Ultrasound, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Computerized Medical Imaging Equipment, Inc. v. Diasonics Ultrasound, Inc., 278 A.D.2d 946, 718 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant failed to establish that the parties agreed to arbitrate their dispute, and thus Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the fourth affirmative defense asserting that the parties must arbitrate their dispute. That affirmative defense was based on an arbitration agreement that had expired before the dispute arose, and defendant failed to establish that the parties had agreed to extend that arbitration agreement (see, Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181, 185-186; see also, Matter of Express Indus. & Term. Corp. v New York State Dept. of Transp., 93 NY2d 584, 589, rearg denied 93 NY2d 1042). [947]*947(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Dismiss Pleading.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Computerized Medical Imaging Equipment, Inc. v. Diasonics Ultrasound, Inc.
303 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 946, 718 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/computerized-medical-imaging-equipment-inc-v-diasonics-ultrasound-inc-nyappdiv-2000.