Computer Sciences Corporation v. Endurance Risk Solutions Assurance Co.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 4, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-01580·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #:___ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/4/2022 __ COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, -against- ENDURANCE RISK SOLUTIONS ASSURANCE CO., HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED, ASPEN INSURANCE LIMITED FOR AND ON 1:20-cv-01580-MKV BEHALF OF LLOYD’S UNDERWRITER SYNDICATE NO. 4711, ASPEN UNDERWRITER ORDER OF DISMISSAL LIMITED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LLOYD’S UNDERWRITER SYNDICATE, ASPEN MANAGING AGENCY LIMITED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LLOYD’S UNDERWRITER SYNDICATION NO. 4711, and LLOYD’S UNDERWRITER SYNDICATE NO. 4711, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a joint letter informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 117]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above- captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 4, 2022. Ifno such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). The clerk of court is also respectfully requested to terminate docket entry 87. SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: April 4, 2022 MARY/KAY YpKO« a New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Computer Sciences Corporation v. Endurance Risk Solutions Assurance Co., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Computer Sciences Corporation v. Endurance Risk Solutions Assurance Co. (Computer Sciences Corporation v. Endurance Risk Solutions Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)