Computer Dimensions v. Basic Four
747 F.2d 708, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17725
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 15, 1984·No. 83-8547·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
747 F.2d 708
Computer Dimensions
v.
Basic Four**
NO. 83-8547
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
OCT 15, 1984
Appeal From: N.D.Ga., 546 F.Supp. 666
AFFIRMED.
**
Local Rule: 25 case
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Computer Dimensions v. Basic Four, 747 F.2d 708, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17725 (11th Cir. 1984).
747 F.2d 708 (Computer Dimensions v. Basic Four) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Truck Center, Inc. v. Central GMC, Inc.
4 A.3d 515 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2010)
Drake v. McNair
993 A.2d 607 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Basken v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
946 A.2d 356 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Arnold R. Rissman v. Owen Randall Rissman and Robert Dunn Glick
213 F.3d 381 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Rissman, Arnold R. v. Rissman, Owen R.
Seventh Circuit, 2000
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Conoco, Inc.
986 S.W.2d 603 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
Sharpe v. Trail
902 P.2d 304 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1995)
Breckenridge Creste Apartments, Ltd. v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.
826 F. Supp. 460 (N.D. Georgia, 1993)
Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
613 A.2d 916 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Amplicon, Inc. v. Marshfield Clinic
786 F. Supp. 1469 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1992)
Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles Wolf
903 F.2d 1414 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Flint Davis v. Sears, Roebuck and Company and Bruce Mason
873 F.2d 888 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
One-O-One Enterprises, Inc. v. Richard E. Caruso
848 F.2d 1283 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
One-O-One Enterprises, Inc. v. Caruso
668 F. Supp. 693 (District of Columbia, 1987)