Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.

99 S.E. 537, 23 Ga. App. 803, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 364
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1919
Docket10259
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 537 (Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co., 99 S.E. 537, 23 Ga. App. 803, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where there was a sale of personal property under an express warranty as to quality, and in defense to a suit for money alleged to be due for the property an express warranty was pleaded, it was error for the court to charge on the subject of implied warranty. On account of this error the judgment overruling the motion for a new tria! is

Reversed.'

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lander Motors, Inc. v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co.
78 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Felder v. Neeves
135 S.E. 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 537, 23 Ga. App. 803, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compton-v-woodruff-machinery-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1919.