Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.
99 S.E. 537, 23 Ga. App. 803, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 364
Opinion
Where there was a sale of personal property under an express warranty as to quality, and in defense to a suit for money alleged to be due for the property an express warranty was pleaded, it was error for the court to charge on the subject of implied warranty. On account of this error the judgment overruling the motion for a new tria! is
Reversed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co., 99 S.E. 537, 23 Ga. App. 803, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 537 (Compton v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lander Motors, Inc. v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co.
78 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Felder v. Neeves
135 S.E. 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)