Compton v. State
32 S.E. 843, 108 Ga. 747, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 326
Opinion
It was error to deny a motion to continue a criminal case, the ground of the motion being the absence of a witness, when it appeared that the showing was in all respects complete, that the facts expected to be proved by this witness bore directly upon the controlling issue in the case and tended strongly to disprove the charge against the accused, and also that there was no disinterested witness other than the one absent by whom the same facts could have been established.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Compton v. State, 32 S.E. 843, 108 Ga. 747, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 326 (Ga. 1899).
32 S.E. 843 (Compton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. State
60 S.E. 211 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Macon & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Anderson
49 S.E. 791 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)