Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail

Fourth Circuit

Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail

215 F. App'x 244

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2007·No. No. 06-7452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bobby L. Compton, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 [245]*245U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:06-cv-00241-sgw-mf, 2006 WL 2336464 (W.D.Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bobby L. Compton, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 [245]*245U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:06-cv-00241-sgw-mf, 2006 WL 2336464 (W.D.Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail, 215 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

215 F. App'x 244 (Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related