Compton v. Jefferson County Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Compton v. Jefferson County Savings Bank

66 So. 446, 188 Ala. 194, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 292

DecidedNovember 7, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 66 So. 446 (Compton v. Jefferson County Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Compton v. Jefferson County Savings Bank, 66 So. 446, 188 Ala. 194, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 292 (Ala. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

By section 26 of the act approved August 26, 1909 (Acts Sp. Sess. 1909', pp. 339, 356), to create and establish the Marengo law and equity court it is provided:

“That in all civil cases at law in the said Marengo law and equity court, the judge thereof may set down any case for hearing on the pleadings alone, and render judgment thereon in term time or during vacation, and from such judgment or ruling on the pleadings an appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court, to- be taken within thirty days after such judgment or ruling is rendered or made; but nothing herein contained shall prevent such judgment from being assigned as error upon an appeal taken to said court after the final determination of said case, if an appeal shall not have been taken under this section.”

Section 42, p. 362, contemplates that civil and other causes enumerated in the section shall be set down, by the court, for hearing and for the settling of the pleadings.

[196]*196According to the letter of section 26, set forth above, it is a condition precedent to the right to appeal before final judgment in a civil case that the judge of the court set the case “for hearing on the pleadings alone.”

The appellee moves this court to dismiss the present appeal, which is from rulings on pleadings only, because the presence of the just stated condition precedent is not shown by the record here. It does not appear from the record that the case had been set down by the judge for hearing on the pleadings alone, and that upon the hearing so ordered the rulings noted and urged for error were then made.. The motion is well taken. Manifestly it was not intended by the act that from every adverse ruling on the pleadings, in the ordinary course of trials of civil cases that had not been set down for hearing on the pleadings alone, there might be an appeal to this court. It is not to- be for one moment conceded that the lawmakers intended to write into law such a mockery of the administration of justice in the county of Marengo.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLELLAN, J.

By section 26 of the act approved August 26, 1909 (Acts Sp. Sess. 1909', pp. 339, 356), to create and establish the Marengo law and equity court it is provided:

“That in all civil cases at law in the said Marengo law and equity court, the judge thereof may set down any case for hearing on the pleadings alone, and render judgment thereon in term time or during vacation, and from such judgment or ruling on the pleadings an appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court, to- be taken within thirty days after such judgment or ruling is rendered or made; but nothing herein contained shall prevent such judgment from being assigned as error upon an appeal taken to said court after the final determination of said case, if an appeal shall not have been taken under this section.”

Section 42, p. 362, contemplates that civil and other causes enumerated in the section shall be set down, by the court, for hearing and for the settling of the pleadings.

[196]*196According to the letter of section 26, set forth above, it is a condition precedent to the right to appeal before final judgment in a civil case that the judge of the court set the case “for hearing on the pleadings alone.”

The appellee moves this court to dismiss the present appeal, which is from rulings on pleadings only, because the presence of the just stated condition precedent is not shown by the record here. It does not appear from the record that the case had been set down by the judge for hearing on the pleadings alone, and that upon the hearing so ordered the rulings noted and urged for error were then made.. The motion is well taken. Manifestly it was not intended by the act that from every adverse ruling on the pleadings, in the ordinary course of trials of civil cases that had not been set down for hearing on the pleadings alone, there might be an appeal to this court. It is not to- be for one moment conceded that the lawmakers intended to write into law such a mockery of the administration of justice in the county of Marengo.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 So. 446, 188 Ala. 194, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compton-v-jefferson-county-savings-bank-ala-1914.